Case Study
His whole presence lived on a platform he does not control.
Before his own system, LinkedIn was Colin's entire presence. When someone wanted to see his work, that meant sending them to a LinkedIn profile.
That is a weaker handoff than it looks, and none of the reasons have anything to do with how good the fit actually is.
- A prospect on a free account cannot message someone they are not connected to. They send a request and wait, or the sender pays for InMail
- Colin does not control LinkedIn. LinkedIn controls what LinkedIn shows
- People increasingly skip search and ask an AI directly. Without his own system, the answer is whatever the platform surfaces that day
If LinkedIn changed its rules tomorrow, everything built there changes with it. No backup, no export, no control.
Not a finished before and after. Colin has not made an update since launch, and the reason is not a lack of options. It is habit. LinkedIn is still the default in his head, built over years of posting there.
If LinkedIn disappeared tomorrow, everything I've built there disappears. I don't have a backup.
What did change is what he could see. Once the system existed as something real to look at, Colin named a distinction he had never consciously articulated. His LinkedIn activity skews toward training. His own system skews toward coaching. Two audiences under one undifferentiated presence, invisible until it was laid out in front of him. Planning does not surface that. Only a real thing does.
Before
LinkedIn as the only answer to "how do I learn more about Colin"
Now
A system he owns outright, with the next move already visible
Performance
97
Below 50, most visitors leave before the page even finishes loading
SEO
100
Most personal sites lose visitors to search before anyone reads a word
Agent-readable
3 / 3
Most sites are invisible to ChatGPT and Claude when someone asks about you
The gap does not close by thinking about it longer. It closes by having something real to react to.
See if Evergreen fits your site